on Barnes&Nobles site, Mr Bell wrote one short, yet flattering review of VIOLET HILL OR THE MAD DIARIES OF NICHOLAS RAMPLING. A review he titled: "A grand renewal of a type of story that has long since lost its shine!" Then proceeds to call my novel "remarkable" and "astounding job" and how he "truly loved it." But don't let me tell you, read it for yourself here. Just scroll down to the bottom of the page.
I'm feeling most humble and truly appreciative of Mr. Bell's words.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Saturday, July 23, 2011
In Memoriam: Amy Winehouse
Very Saddened about Amy's passing. It feels as terrible as when Aaliyah died in the plane crash.
Yes, because of her behavior and drug abuse, we knew that more than likely she wasn't gonna make it, but damn it I held out a bit of hope that she ultimately would come out at the other side of all the darkness around her.
Yes, she was a very troubled young woman, but it doesn't take away from the fact that she was such a raw talent, the likes we seldom get to experience. Making fun of her dead is easy, cheap, and shameful.
At least, her demons can no longer haunt her, she's finally free at last. My heart goes out to her family.
All I can think of now is her exquisite, heartwrenching, and arguably best music video for what I considered her very best song: Back to Black.
Sunday, July 17, 2011
HARRY POTTER: Ranking All 8 Films.
I've seen HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 2, five times already. A bit obsessive? Yes. Had enough of it? No. I will see it as many times as I can managed. It is the end of an era, something that, not just me, but for many, has been part of our lives for over a decade. How can I not relish and re-watch THE END multiple times? I believe any serious Potterphile should at the very least, watch the movie twice.
But now that I've seen them all, it was inevitable that I (and I'm sure every fan, magazine, blog, etc,) would take time to rank them in terms of greatness. They've all conjured a spell on fans worldwide, but of course, some of them--depending on the director--had a stronger, longer-lasting spell than others.
For all the magical moments, and every thrilling charm cast with visually-arresting, cinematic wizardry, what makes the POTTER films stand apart from most fantasy films (mainly all the copycats that came after it, trying to become the next Potter-like blockbuster), it's the acting, the quiet moments, the way each character latches him or herself onto your heart, no spell require, that makes them, special. Even the evil characters you can't completely hate, because the level of acting of these British actors is so potent, so natural.... to this day I'm besides myself that not one of them has been properly singled out during awards season. The films became more like the endearing drama of an orphan boy, his two awesome best friends, and the dire circumstances surrounding him, forcing him to face evil at such a young age, that just happened to be set on a magical realm. The magic, for all the amount of it that existed, was always secondary to the characters. That's how Jo Rowling wrote them, that's how (starting with) Alfonso Cuaron and his successors filmed them, that's why movie after movie they became greater and bigger, enchanting even those who've never bothered or care to read the books.
So without any more delaying, here's my ranking of all 8 films:
But now that I've seen them all, it was inevitable that I (and I'm sure every fan, magazine, blog, etc,) would take time to rank them in terms of greatness. They've all conjured a spell on fans worldwide, but of course, some of them--depending on the director--had a stronger, longer-lasting spell than others.
For all the magical moments, and every thrilling charm cast with visually-arresting, cinematic wizardry, what makes the POTTER films stand apart from most fantasy films (mainly all the copycats that came after it, trying to become the next Potter-like blockbuster), it's the acting, the quiet moments, the way each character latches him or herself onto your heart, no spell require, that makes them, special. Even the evil characters you can't completely hate, because the level of acting of these British actors is so potent, so natural.... to this day I'm besides myself that not one of them has been properly singled out during awards season. The films became more like the endearing drama of an orphan boy, his two awesome best friends, and the dire circumstances surrounding him, forcing him to face evil at such a young age, that just happened to be set on a magical realm. The magic, for all the amount of it that existed, was always secondary to the characters. That's how Jo Rowling wrote them, that's how (starting with) Alfonso Cuaron and his successors filmed them, that's why movie after movie they became greater and bigger, enchanting even those who've never bothered or care to read the books.
So without any more delaying, here's my ranking of all 8 films:
- HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN: I know there's a few who don't think highly of PRISONER OF AZKABAN, but that's just foolery. AZKABAN was the film that changed the franchise and set it on it's way to greatness. Alfonso Cuaron brilliantly got the characters out of the light touch of the first two movies and into darker territory, he also got them out of the school uniform and made them more real. Watch the first two films and then this one, and you can just see how he was able to bring the "actor" out of Daniel, Emma, and Rupert. From this point on, they weren't just mere "child actors," they were actors. Also the casting of Michael Gambon as Dumbledore after the passing of Richard Harris was just genius. His Dumbledore is the one people will forever remember, and not because he played it more than the late Richard did, but because he made Dumbledore human, instead of the regal, kind yet detached version from the first two films. Harry's winter isolation, rebellious/angry attitude, his pain, his realization of having family (Sirius) are all moments that connect you with him. AZKABAN remains the template by which the succeeding directors base their takes on each following book. Just try to imagine what HARRY POTTER AND.... would have looked like, have Chris Columbus kept directing or if the other directors had followed his lead?
- HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 1: Here's the thing, Part 2 is freaking awesome in every level, and though I don't mind the relentless action, Part 1 has more intimate moments that hit home a bit more. It's the quiet before the storm and it's dreadful. We have an idea of how badly the storm is going to break, but the quiet, the wait, the hesitation, confusion, uncertainty on Harry's, Hermione's, and Ron's faces while on the run with seemingly no one to turn to, makes you feel desperate for them. Ron's departure, and Hermione's heartbreak, Harry trying to console her with a dance, Harry's face seeing his parent's grave, even freaking Dobby's death, just tears you apart.
- HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 2: The end we have all been waiting/dreading, and how emotional it was. After multiple viewings, I have to say, I've started feeling sad for even Voldemort as the last horcruxes were destroyed and he felt it. Even when he brought Harry's supposed dead body back to Hogarts to brag, you could see the trepidation in his eyes, here he was finally unstoppable with harry dead, and yet, even he wasn't sure anymore. Ralph Fiennes played him brilliantly during those final scenes, showing the madness consuming him, and his fear of certain death. And yet, it was so (understandably) busy that it left very little room for the special moments. Bellatrix's death seemed rather too quick for her character, and Fred's, Remus', and Tonk's dead should have felt more emotional, yet they didn't quite reach the level they should have been for these characters. On the other hand, Severus' demise was as shocking and sad as it should have been, and Harry's view of his memories through the pensieve were effective on conveying the tragedy and heroism behind his character. Alan Rickman remains the acting MVP through the whole series, hands down.
- HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX: Sirius death, Bellatrice's emergence, Harry and Cho's kiss, Dumbledore and Voldemort's showdown at the ministry of magic, the delicious malice of professor Umbridge.... taking a clue from Alfonso Cuaron, David Yates took over from Mike Newell's and his uneven rendering of GOBLET OF FIRE, and brought the films back to their "characters first" focus, and the result was as explosive and exciting as Hermoine pointing her wand and shouting: "bombardo!"
- HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE: Though David Yates skillful eyed should forever be commended for creating magic out of the last 3 books in the series, HALF-BLOOD PRINCE will forever be his least effective. In terms of character development and acting, it is one of the strongest. Michael Gambon does so much with Dumbledore on this one, he should have been nominated in the same way that Ian Mckellen was for THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING. Tom Felton gives so much gravitas to Draco, it is like seeing the character anew. But, and though I've tried to judged the films on their own and not compare them to the books, and it is true that all films differ from aspects of the books, the changes on HALF-BLOOD PRINCE are so glaring that they just can't be ignored. Harry and Ginny's kiss, the burning of the burrow and excising Dumbledore's funeral from the film are nearly unforgivable.
- HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS: Looking back, this is probably the most surprising of all the films, because no one expected Chris Columbus to reined in his penchant for showy moments, and actually put greater emphasis on the story. Oh, he still indulges himself on magical aha! set pieces, but not as over the top as the first film.
- HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE: The most uneven of all 8 films. Mike Newell tried to compromise between the special effects showmanship and cuteness of the Chris Columbus films, and the character development of Alfonso Cuaron, leaving GOBLET OF FIRE entertaining yet not the soaring epic it should have been. It must be pointed out that he also had to condense the longest book, which also made the film feeling like it was missing something, by everything that was left on the floor of the cutting room.
- HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE: Though full of magic, and granted, base on the first novel which was very much aimed at kids, Chris Columbus opted to go for the cuteness of his HOME ALONE movies, leaving SORCERER'S STONE a thrilling first look at the world of HARRY POTTER but one with no emotional connection. You never feel worried for Harry and Co. You don't develop empathy during the scene of in which Harry sees his parents in the mirror. But you do laugh at all the little enchantments cast, all the moments of discovery, and all the cuteness on screen. It doesn't leave you wanting more.
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Goodbye Harry, thanks for the magic.
Some movies have one single scene that tugs at your heart and makes you tear up....Deathly Hallows has about 20 such scenes.
Greatest movie of the year.
I feel like I was there in the forbidden forest, and I was the one struck with the killing curse..... but I wouldn't have it any other way. It trully is the end of an era, the end of innocence as it were. Like childhood, once it's gone, you may carry it with you in memory, but you can't never re-live it, but in many ways, that's what makes it special. Not many movies can make you feel that way.
I can wait to re-watch it over and over and over again. Goodbye Harry, thanks for the magic.
Greatest movie of the year.
I feel like I was there in the forbidden forest, and I was the one struck with the killing curse..... but I wouldn't have it any other way. It trully is the end of an era, the end of innocence as it were. Like childhood, once it's gone, you may carry it with you in memory, but you can't never re-live it, but in many ways, that's what makes it special. Not many movies can make you feel that way.
I can wait to re-watch it over and over and over again. Goodbye Harry, thanks for the magic.
Monday, July 11, 2011
On Pixar's Cars 2
I am the first to admit that I wasn't exactly super excited for CARS 2, they way I've been with just about every other Pixar film. But I wasn't exactly excited about the first one, and I ended up loving that one quite a lot.
CARS 2 may not have the emotional punch associated with most Pixar films, and it's eco-friendly message may seem even more blunt to people than that of WALL-E, but at least, Pixar didn't give us the same movie all over again, and that's the single greatest reward watching this, quite entertaining, funny, action-packed sequel.
Yes, Mater gets put front and center as the main character this time around, but he and the little winks here and there, like Geisha cars, Zumo wrestler cars, the Queen of England car, are just too much fun to look at to not appreciate the movie for just a good popcorn film. It also looks marvelous, so shiny and full of lustre and slick, I wanted to reach out and touch the screen. Even the ocean--on the high octane opening sequence--seems more vivid than your average hollywood movie. Voice-wise, Sir Michael Caine takes top honors as an all out British spy to rival James Bond himself, and John Turturro is a hoot as Francesco Bernoulli, an italian race car that's Lightning McQueen's main nemesis on the tracks.
It is far from what some are calling Pixar's first misfire, they weren't trying to make another Toy Story 3 or a WALL-E, this is more in the vain of just the pure fun of the first CARS, A BUG'S LIFE, and the thrilling action of THE INCREDIBLES, and for that type of escapism, it deserves to be viewed and enjoyed. B+
CARS 2 may not have the emotional punch associated with most Pixar films, and it's eco-friendly message may seem even more blunt to people than that of WALL-E, but at least, Pixar didn't give us the same movie all over again, and that's the single greatest reward watching this, quite entertaining, funny, action-packed sequel.
Yes, Mater gets put front and center as the main character this time around, but he and the little winks here and there, like Geisha cars, Zumo wrestler cars, the Queen of England car, are just too much fun to look at to not appreciate the movie for just a good popcorn film. It also looks marvelous, so shiny and full of lustre and slick, I wanted to reach out and touch the screen. Even the ocean--on the high octane opening sequence--seems more vivid than your average hollywood movie. Voice-wise, Sir Michael Caine takes top honors as an all out British spy to rival James Bond himself, and John Turturro is a hoot as Francesco Bernoulli, an italian race car that's Lightning McQueen's main nemesis on the tracks.
It is far from what some are calling Pixar's first misfire, they weren't trying to make another Toy Story 3 or a WALL-E, this is more in the vain of just the pure fun of the first CARS, A BUG'S LIFE, and the thrilling action of THE INCREDIBLES, and for that type of escapism, it deserves to be viewed and enjoyed. B+
Sunday, July 10, 2011
You have an easier time finding a job than a good roommate in NYC
Which is unexplicably, unbelievable.
I think I've seen now like 20 people in a week, and no one suitable yet.
Most people have a lot of concerns about the area, 'cause you know, there are tons of questionable areas in NYC, also rent prices are frakking high, and the places miserably small. Add to that, that landlords are assholes, sometimes there's just no good transportation, your roommates are crazy, moody, dirty scumbags, etc.
But NONE of those things apply to me and my place. It's big enough, the area is one of nyc best neighborhoods, the rent is quite affordable compare to what those around me pay, there's plenty of transportation on my block (4 train lines), the landlord isn't the friendliest person, but he at least is on top of any issue and solves it right away, and I'm the most easygoing person, who doesn't care who you are/do as long as you are clean and pay on time, and are some druggy, party animal.
The issues are that most people, don't seem to read your roommate ad, and ask you tons of questions to things you alredy went out of your way to answer in said ad.
Waste your time by stopping by and telling you they love the place, but they still want to wait to hear from other places for X reason. Everyone wants to walk around waiting for something they deem better, and therefore wasting your time. Time you could have use to talk to a more potential roommate.
You tell them the move in date is X date, they say yes, then tell you they can't move in that date and can you wait for them.
They say they are available all day, when you clear a time for them, they say can't make it and if it could be hours later or another day. or that something like go check out a restaurant with a friend came up, and apparently that's more important than having a place to live.
Then there's the issue with trying to read people through their white lies. Every single response claims they are super clean, neat, quiet, etc. C'mon people, though I want someone that is relatively clean, I rather live with someone that honestly says: "I may forget to clean right that instant and leave dishes overnight 'cause I'm super tired, but I make it a point to clean them the next day." I can live with that. Usually the super everything are the least clean, neat people in the world.
Ok, I'm done venting. I'm hoping I'll find someone relatively awesome today and be done with roommate search hell.
I think I've seen now like 20 people in a week, and no one suitable yet.
Most people have a lot of concerns about the area, 'cause you know, there are tons of questionable areas in NYC, also rent prices are frakking high, and the places miserably small. Add to that, that landlords are assholes, sometimes there's just no good transportation, your roommates are crazy, moody, dirty scumbags, etc.
But NONE of those things apply to me and my place. It's big enough, the area is one of nyc best neighborhoods, the rent is quite affordable compare to what those around me pay, there's plenty of transportation on my block (4 train lines), the landlord isn't the friendliest person, but he at least is on top of any issue and solves it right away, and I'm the most easygoing person, who doesn't care who you are/do as long as you are clean and pay on time, and are some druggy, party animal.
The issues are that most people, don't seem to read your roommate ad, and ask you tons of questions to things you alredy went out of your way to answer in said ad.
Waste your time by stopping by and telling you they love the place, but they still want to wait to hear from other places for X reason. Everyone wants to walk around waiting for something they deem better, and therefore wasting your time. Time you could have use to talk to a more potential roommate.
You tell them the move in date is X date, they say yes, then tell you they can't move in that date and can you wait for them.
They say they are available all day, when you clear a time for them, they say can't make it and if it could be hours later or another day. or that something like go check out a restaurant with a friend came up, and apparently that's more important than having a place to live.
Then there's the issue with trying to read people through their white lies. Every single response claims they are super clean, neat, quiet, etc. C'mon people, though I want someone that is relatively clean, I rather live with someone that honestly says: "I may forget to clean right that instant and leave dishes overnight 'cause I'm super tired, but I make it a point to clean them the next day." I can live with that. Usually the super everything are the least clean, neat people in the world.
Ok, I'm done venting. I'm hoping I'll find someone relatively awesome today and be done with roommate search hell.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)